The Colorado Avalanche made two moves this afternoon, locking up defensemen Brent Burns and Brett Kulak before the offseason could get complicated.
Burns gets a one-year deal. Kulak gets five years.
-
-
Burns is 41 years old. That's not a typo. He played all 82 games this season, posted 35 points, finished at +33, and scored 5 game-winning goals.
That +33 is the number that matters most. On a blue line anchored around Devon Toews and Cale Makar, Burns earned his ice time every single night.
In 13 playoff games, he added 4 assists and went plus-9. No goals. But he didn't need them. His job was to not be a liability, and he wasn't.
A $1 million cap hit for a 41-year-old defenseman with a +33 regular season is about as low-risk as a contract gets in this league. Chris MacFarland knows what he's paying for.
Kulak's five-year deal is the one worth watching
The Burns signing is easy to understand. The Kulak deal is the one that needs a closer look.
Kulak, 32, put up just 12 points in 83 games this season. He finished at -4. Not exactly the profile of a defenseman who earns a five-year commitment.
His playoff numbers were better, 5 points in 13 games and a +1 rating, including a game-winning goal. That's something. Not enough to explain five years on its own.
Here's the thing about this Avalanche group: they went 55-16-11, finished first overall with 302 goals for against only 203 against, and they still needed Kulak dressed every night. Jared Bednar kept him in the lineup through a deep playoff run for a reason.
Sometimes the analytics don't tell the whole story. Kulak plays a brand of hockey that doesn't show up in the box score easily. Positioning, communication, reliability in the defensive zone when the top pairs are resting.
Still, five years is a long commitment for a bottom-pair guy in his 30s. At his current $2,750,000 cap number, it's manageable. But the term is the gamble, not the dollars.
Colorado posted a goal differential of +99 this season. Best in the league. You don't build that by accident, and you don't tear it apart over the offseason just because a defenseman's point totals look modest.
MacFarland is clearly betting that stability on the back end matters more right now than chasing an upgrade that might not exist.
Burns coming back for another season at the age of 41 is the feel-good story. The beard, the number 84, the one-year deal that keeps him in the fold without strangling cap space.
The Kulak commitment is the one with real consequences. Five years from now, if Colorado is still competing, it'll look like smart retention. If they're not, that contract will be in every trade deadline conversation.
Is a five-year deal for Brett Kulak a smart retention move or a long-term cap risk?
Also read on Markerzone.com:
It's been confirmed for Matthew Knies and the Maple Leafs just made a huge announcement
